|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
55
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 20:30:00 -
[1] - Quote
James 315 wrote: When I arrived in his ice field, having carefully crafted a way to destroy his supposedly invincible ship, and having painstakingly calculated the means to kill his supposedly unkillable pod--that was the first time he ever played EVE.
Quoted for bump and for support. The fight begins today. |

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
55
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 05:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
Corbin Blair wrote:EFF ONEF1 wrote:both sides are asking CCP to change/remove/nerf/buff they way the other side plays the game.
everyone is a hypocrite. No, actually. I agreed with the miners when they wanted better tanks for hulks. It's stupid that they can't fit a tank equivalent to other medium T2 ships. They have no hardpoints and tiny drone bays so it's not like they'll suddenly become uber combat ships. I also think high sec income should be nerfed severely. I haven't mined since the beginning of Eve, but when I did, I did it in a 0.2. I'm all for miners getting all the buffs they want. Believe it or not it's possible to be a miner who isn't a carebear. I'd love if they doubled the income from arkanor in fact. I do, however, want to nerf the **** out of carebears of all kinds and won't be happy until high sec income is appropriate for the newbie area that it is. I'd like level 3 mission income to be cut in half and level 4 missions and incursions to be moved to low sec.
Precisely. Ninja-nerf highsec by buffing low and null - problem solved. |

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
55
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 06:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
Andreus Ixiris wrote:Too long, didn't read most of it.
What I did read was hysterical garbage.
What you did not read was the truth about people like you. You don't need to read it as you already know it's true. |

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
55
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 12:11:00 -
[4] - Quote
Gorenaire wrote:Andski wrote:Gorenaire wrote:3/ what's teh big deal if people want to be risk free in high sec ?
4/ why "carebears" would be second class Eve citizens ?
5/ you realize that full pvp centric games are bad business model , right? 3) not the game for them 4) bottom rung of the ladder 5) counterpoint: eve's been running since 2003 just fine Eve has been runnning fine since 2003 because it offers a wide range of environment, from relative high sec safety to full blown pvp environment with no local like wormholes. Now if you remove the notion of protected space like high sec and low sec sentries, the subs would dive big timeand in the end, subscriptions are what matter.
The point is that if highsec PVP gets nerfed to a degree where it is no longer feasible, EVE will cease to be what it is. The only alternative for CCP would be to nerf highsec income hardcore, as in making it 10 times less profitable be either reducing income in high or boosting low/null. If I can be at 80% income rate with 100% safety, why would I bother taking even 1% risk? 35bil mission ships would be the standard in highsec, grinding ISK at an even faster rate than your average cost-efficient ship in low/null.
If your vision of EVE has room for a 100% risk-free environment which also provides relatively good income then perhaps your should find a different game. Who do you think shows up at fanfest? PVPers. Who was there initially when EVE began? PVPers. Who constitutes the backbone of the advertised EVE gameplay? PVPers. Who engages in meaningful/long lasting/world-changing events? You guessed right: PVPers. The pure PVEer could play EVE Offline and have the same impact on the world.
They day CCP mans up and decides to take the unsub hit from all those self-righteous carebears, that will be one glorious day indeed. If on the other hand EVE becomes another carebear MMO, I won't even feel bad leaving the game as the game would no longer exist. Either scenario works for me to be honest, my life does not depend on me being successful in EVE Online. |

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
55
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 13:16:00 -
[5] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:I skipped truckloads of OP drivel to focus on this: James 315 wrote: They may have spent years logged in, but did they ever experience anything? The first time the game evoked a genuine human emotion from the miner is when he saw me kill his ship. When he was spending his years carting around ore, it was not EVE--it was a joke. When I arrived in his ice field, having carefully crafted a way to destroy his supposedly invincible ship, and having painstakingly calculated the means to kill his supposedly unkillable pod--that was the first time he ever played EVE. He would say it was an act of griefing. I would call it a masterpiece. He should be, if not grateful for being killed, at least appreciative of the art.
And what about the carebear's vision? What do carebears want to do in their fantasy EVE, a sterilized PvE game? For the most part, nothing.
Who are you to decide how others are meant to play or how good has to be their experience in EvE? Leave to CCP to mediate between the differing requests. Edit: Profanity removed, CCP Phantom
LOL all I read is: bla bla bla, I got owned by CCP Phantom.
But in all seriousness, care to explain why do you play EVE, the best SCI-FI PVP MMO as it is advertised? Sounds like you are then one imposing playstyles for a SCI-FI PVE SOLO which is why no PVPer will take your opinion seriously. This is OUR game, not yours. As long as I can keep doing solo PVE outside of highsec quite easily, I will never support your closed-minded opinion.
If you want no risks, why should you get any reward? |

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
55
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 13:37:00 -
[6] - Quote
Razgriz Shaishi wrote:Read all of it, and I must say, I am amazed by the depths of your obsession. You have reached a new, never before seen level of obsession on the internet, and that is quite a feat. Now please register for residence in the nearest insane asylum.
"I came, I read, I trolled".
I lolled. |

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
55
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 13:46:00 -
[7] - Quote
Takseen wrote:Thor Kerrigan wrote:
But in all seriousness, care to explain why do you play EVE, the best SCI-FI PVP MMO as it is advertised?
For the Sci-fi and the persistent game world with other people in it. The pvp itself is unappealing.
Then you got the wrong game brah, and I don't want you to like PVP because I do. It just sucks you play a game where PVP is all around you, even in highsec, right? Removing PVP from anywhere would hurt what the game was initially all about. Do you really so openly demand EVE to mold into wow-in-space? |

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
55
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 14:06:00 -
[8] - Quote
Gerald Taric wrote:OP tries to hit Gerald with MASSIVE POSTING. "TL;DR" shild from Geralds ship repels it. Before i read all of this massive wall of words, i wish to know one thing: I myself consider me being a (proud) carebear, because i avoid PvP and prefer PvE action in WH- and HighSec-space. Nevertheless ... i'm pretty fine with the " there's no save place in EVE" and do NOT want it to be removed. In fact i consider it as a challenge. Therefore ... how is a carebear defined in EVE? 
You sir, are no carebear. Mystery solved. We can be friends and call each other carebears if you wish though  |

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
55
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 14:15:00 -
[9] - Quote
Kestrix wrote:Corbin Blair wrote:Kestrix wrote:Thats wrong, Null sec mining does happen and is very profitable. Says the guy in the high sec corp. And of course I couldn't possibley have firends in other none hi-sec corps. Infact I'm in the process of moving out to null sec, you guys play too rough in Hi-sec for me.
We're just bustin' your balls. But I have seen the true face of null mining... and it is scary.  |

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
56
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 14:17:00 -
[10] - Quote
Takseen wrote:Thor Kerrigan wrote:Takseen wrote:Thor Kerrigan wrote:
But in all seriousness, care to explain why do you play EVE, the best SCI-FI PVP MMO as it is advertised?
For the Sci-fi and the persistent game world with other people in it. The pvp itself is unappealing. Then you got the wrong game brah, and I don't want you to like PVP because I do. It just sucks you play a game where PVP is all around you, even in highsec, right? Removing PVP from anywhere would hurt what the game was initially all about. Do you really so openly demand EVE to mold into wow-in-space? I do like Pvp. I just don't like Eve's pvp, so I don't participate in it. If you want more people to participate in the pvp, writing multi-page manifestos about how people who don't like Eve's pvp are Playing The Game Wrong won't do you any good. You either make the pvp more appealing, or you accept that the type of pvp you enjoy isn't very popular.
The worst part is that the OP actually covers the point you just made. Seriously. |
|

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
56
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 14:22:00 -
[11] - Quote
Takseen wrote:Vaju Enki wrote: EvE Online is not the game for you.
My subscription fees say otherwise.
So if I subscribe to a Tango dance class, then demand them to teach me Baseball because I payed for GODDAMN BASEBALL, my argument still holds?
c'mon maaan! 
We all signed up for this, some us will like the game other won't. I'm sorry you lost your money, I truly am. |

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
56
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 14:34:00 -
[12] - Quote
Takseen wrote:Thor Kerrigan wrote: The worst part is that the OP actually covers the point you just made. Seriously.
He could have covered the Grandfather Paradox and the Unified Field Theory for all I can remember. The posts weren't well written enough for me to bother reading them at length. I'll go back and have a look so.
In complete honesty, just between you and me, I saw the title and was like "meh, not sure any sort of argument can lead me to believe that..."
It is quite outrageous, I agree. What is even more outrageous is that he's right. |

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
58
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 14:42:00 -
[13] - Quote
Takseen wrote:Thor Kerrigan wrote:
The worst part is that the OP actually covers the point you just made. Seriously.
Ok I reread "how carebears killed nullsec pvp", as ridiculous as the idea was. I get what he was saying, you need someone or something for the pvpers on either side to fight over. At the time, it was mining fleets. Over time, miners presumably found this less and less appealing. That horse has bolted, I don't think you can entice them back. You(or CCP) need to come up with another conflict driver in nullsec.
All that is required is a proper risk/reward distribution. Highsec gave too much rewards for the lack of risks. Hell, I would not mind there being a 100% safezone if the rewards there are 0%. Want 99% risks? Then you get 1% rewards. At least they can still be AFK and keep doing what they are doing, without the fear of losing their ship.
But wait, what? They ask for better rewards? Why do they even need rewards in the first place if they have nothing to replace. The argument falls flat pretty hard at this point. I'm sure if carebears described in the OP could mine docked in the station they would. |

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
58
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 15:09:00 -
[14] - Quote
Takseen wrote:
I subscribed to a game that had a vast, single-shard universe/server, a wealth of ship, module and skill choices, and a vast selection of space related activities to choose from. One of which was pvp, which I concluded was not in my interest any more then mining was. That game has not fundamentally changed since I arrived. Its the zealots on either side who want to either turf everyone bar the newbies out of highsec, or prevent all violence in highsec that are trying to fundamentally change the game. And I'm not a fan of that.
You represent/decribe the "compromise" state between PVPers and Carebears. However, as the OP points out, carebears are not interested in a compromise state and they confirmed it to him on several occasions.
None of the "pro leet PVPers" I had the chance to discuss this with said they were completely against a form of "safer" space. They are quite aware trial accounts need that space, as do the occasional solo or extremely casual players. But here is the catch: EVE can't be full of trial accounts, solo or extremely casual players. |
|
|
|